Delay, buggy code, security vulnerability, scope variance and USD 35 M at stake

Delay, buggy code, security vulnerability, scope variance and USD 35M at stake!. Sounds like a classic case study of a failed project, and the key stakeholders are  Hertz and Accenture. These could have been avoided. Who is ultimately responsible for this?.  

Click here to read the original article 

 

Professional ethics of project managers

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: